Complainant was a radio commentator who interviewed the two accused regarding their marketing business, which solicits funds from the general public, promising an 800% profit. The latter induced the complainant to invest in the business, in the process thereof, issued a postdated check wherein the amount in figures was P1,200,000 and the amount in words was P1,000,200. The check when presented in the bank was dishonored and the accused refused to redeem or pay the check. This prompted the complainant to file a case of estafa against the accused to which they were found guilty of.
HELD:
Accused tried to contend that if the trial court followed the admission and stipulation of facts submitted by them, it would prove that there was sufficient funds. The check had a discrepancy between the amount in figures and in words. Following NIL, the check was issued for P1,000,200—meaning that this could be validly supported by their business’ funds. Nonetheless, this is misplaced since this rule of interpretation finds no room in this case. The agreement was perfectly clear that at the end of 21 days, the investment of complainant would increase by 800% or P1,200,000.
