RUBISO V. RIVERA
37 PHIL 72
FACTS:
Rubiso filed a complaint against Rivera for the recovery of a pilot boat. He alleged that he is the rightful owner of a pilot boat, which was stranded and recovered by Rivera. The latter refused to return the said boat as he alleged too that he was the owner thereof. It was known that the originalowners of the boat had secretly sold the pilot boat to Rivera on an earlier date than the sale in a public auction to Rubiso. Nonetheless, material is the fact that the entry into the customs registry of the sale of the boat was later than the recording of the sale to Rubiso.
HELD:
The requisite of registration in the registry, of the purchase of the vessel, is necessary and indispensable in order that the purchaser’s rights may be maintained against a third person. Such registration is required both by the Code of Commerce and Act 1900. It is undeniable, ergo, that Rivera doesn’t have a better right than Rubiso over the pilot boat.Ships and vessels, whether moved by steam or by sail, partake, to a certain extent of the nature and conditions of real property, on account of their value and importance in world commerce; and for this, the provisions of the Code of Commerce are nearly identical with Article 1473 of the CC.