FIRST DIVISION
[G.R. Nos. 129756-58. January 19, 2001]
PEOPLE OF THE PHILIPPINES, plaintiff-appellee, vs.
JULIAN ESCAÑO y DEEN, VIRGILIO USANA y TOME, and JERRY LOPEZ CASABAAN, accused.
VIRGILIO USANA
y TOME, and JERRY LOPEZ y CASABAAN, accused-appellants.
R E S O L U T I O N
DAVIDE, JR., C.J.:
For the Court’s
consideration is a Manifestation and Motion of accused Julian Deen Escaño,
praying that the Court’s Decision of 28 January 2000[1] acquitting accused-appellants Virgilio T.
Usana and Jerry C. Lopez in Criminal Case No. 95-936 be applied to him as
co-accused, on the strength of Section 11(a), Rule 122 of the New Rules on
Criminal Procedure. He then prays that
an order be issued by the Court acquitting him and directing his immediate
release from confinement at the New Bilibid Prison.
Escaño, together with
accused-appellants Usana and Lopez, was charged before the Regional Trial Court
of Makati City, Branch 64, with violation of Section 4, Article II of Republic
Act No. 6425, as amended, in Criminal Case No. 95-936. Escaño and Usana were also charged with
violation of Presidential Decree No. 1866 in Criminal Cases Nos. 95-937 and
95-938, respectively. The case were
consolidated and jointly tried.
In its decision of 30 May
1997, the trial court convicted all three in Criminal Case No. 95-936, Escaño
in Criminal Case No. 95-937, and Usana in Criminal Case No. 95-938. Escaño filed a Notice of Appeal but he
withdrew the same by motion, which was granted by the trial court in its Order
of 17 July 1997.
In filing the instant
motion, Escaño relies on a single ground, that is, that the 28 January 2000
Decision of this Court on the appeal interposed by his co-accused is applicable
and favorable to him and entitles him to an acquittal pursuant to Section
11(a), Rule 122 of the New Rules on Criminal Procedure. The pertinent provision states a follows:
Section 11. Effect of
appeal by any of several accused. -
(a) An appeal taken by one or
more of several accused shall not affect those who did not appeal, except
insofar as the judgment of the appellate court is favorable and applicable to
the latter.[2]
Escaño argues that the
Decision of this Court is applicable and favorable to him in that “the factual
findings therein equally support the conclusion that not all the elements of
the offense charged have been prove[d] and that no criminal liability can,
thus, be imputed to [him].”[3]
After evaluating the
issue and arguments raised by Escaño, the Office of the Solicitor General
manifested no objection to his Manifestation and Motion and recommended that
the same be given due course.
We find merit in the
instant Manifestation and Notion.
Consistent with our ruling in a number of cases,[4] the acquittal of Usana and Lopez based on
reasonable doubt should benefit movant Escaño notwithstanding the fact that he
withdrew his appeal.
In view of the
foregoing, the instant
Manifestation and Motion is hereby GRANTED.
The decision of 30 May 1997 of the Regional Trial Court, Makati, Branch
64, insofar as Criminal Case No. 95-936 is concerned with regard to accused
Julian Deen Escaño, holding him guilty of violation of Section 4, Article II of
R.A. No. 6425, as amended, is hereby REVERSED and SET ASIDE; and another is
hereby rendered ACQUITTING him on ground of reasonable doubt and ORDERING his
immediate release from confinement at the New Bilibid Prison unless his further
detention is justified for any lawful ground.
The Director of the Bureau of Corrections is hereby directed to report
to the Court the release of said accused within five (5) days from notice of
this resolution.
SO ORDERED.
Puno, Kapunan, Pardo, and Santiago, JJ., concur.
[1] Rollo,
305-318.
[2] The
wording of this provision was retained under the Revised Rules of Criminal
Procedure, which took effect on 1 December 2000.
[3] Rollo,
340.
[4] People
v. Tujon, 215 SCRA 559 [1992]; People v. Perez, 263 SCRA 206
[1996], citing People v. Fernandez, 186 SCRA 830 [1990]; People v.
Ferras, 289 SCRA 94 [1998]; People v. Fronda, G.R. No. 130602, 15 March
2000.